Main Page
From Wiki Resource
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 19:43, 8 March 2012 (edit) Kd11ie (Talk | contribs) (→'''Curriculum development''') ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 19:43, 8 March 2012 (edit) (undo) Rp81kv (Talk | contribs) (→'''Curriculum development''') Next diff → |
||
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
==='''Curriculum development'''=== | ==='''Curriculum development'''=== | ||
====''Pro'':==== | ====''Pro'':==== | ||
- | * | + | *can be edited by faculty and students |
+ | |||
+ | *collaborated with colleagues and other students | ||
+ | *syllabus could be multimedia | ||
* | * | ||
====''Con'':==== | ====''Con'':==== | ||
+ | *students can change assignments | ||
* | * | ||
- | * | ||
- | |||
==='''Teaching'''=== | ==='''Teaching'''=== |
Revision as of 19:43, 8 March 2012
Contents |
Overview of Wikisand Resources
Best Educational Wikis of 2011
How Brock Can Help One perspective:
USING A WIKI IN K-8 SCHOOLING
Curriculum development
Pro:
Con:
Teaching
Pro:
Con:
Learning
Pro:
Con:
Assessment
Pro:
Con:
Other Uses
Pro:
Con:
USING A WIKI IN GRADES 9-12
Curriculum development
Pro:
- starting new thread of information for others to look at
- open to more contributors than just students
Con:
- are you able to keep on track with the Ministry Curriculum with Student lead learning
Teaching
Pro:
- Net-etiquette
- Inclusive of all
Con:
- accessibility
- safety
Learning
Pro:
- creative
- engaging
- access to internet, wealth of knowledge to pull from
Con:
- Authentic information? How do you know?
- References are not needed
Assessment
Pro:
Con:
Other Uses
Pro:
Con:
USING A WIKI IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Curriculum development
Pro:
- can be edited by faculty and students
- collaborated with colleagues and other students
- syllabus could be multimedia
Con:
- students can change assignments
Teaching
Pro:
Con:
Learning
Pro:
Con:
Assessment
Pro:
Con:
Other Uses
Pro:
Con:
USING A WIKI IN THE WORKPLACE
Curriculum development
Pro:
Con:
Teaching
Pro:
Con:
Learning
Pro:
Con:
Assessment
Pro:
Con: