This Wiki is currently "locked". At this time no edits or non-Brock accounts can be created.

Main Page

From RECL 3P25 Fall 2011 - Group 06 - Meeting Management

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:28, 24 November 2011 (edit)
Ap09rz (Talk | contribs)
(Description of the Technique)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 21:31, 24 November 2011 (edit) (undo)
Ap09rz (Talk | contribs)
(Description of the Technique)
Next diff →
Line 11: Line 11:
'''Definition of Meeting Management:''' The process of planning, monitoring and coordinating all components of a meeting including date, destination, venue, invitations, registration, speakers, agenda planning, time keeping, and facilitation<ref>Cvent. (2001). Meeting Management. Cvent Event Survey & eMarketing Solutions. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.cvent.com/en/resources/meeting-management.shtml </ref>. '''Definition of Meeting Management:''' The process of planning, monitoring and coordinating all components of a meeting including date, destination, venue, invitations, registration, speakers, agenda planning, time keeping, and facilitation<ref>Cvent. (2001). Meeting Management. Cvent Event Survey & eMarketing Solutions. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.cvent.com/en/resources/meeting-management.shtml </ref>.
-'''Background of the Technique:'''+'''Background of the Technique:''' Over the years meetings developed a bad reputation for being long, boring and sometimes pointless. On average researchers found that professionals attend 61 meetings per month and also found that around half the time spent in those meetings is wasted. This means that around 30 hours a month is wasted which is time that could be used to be doing actual work. Some problems with meetings are:
 +*Meetings are long, inefficient, and generate few results
 +*With so much time spent in meetings, employees have less time to finish their own work
 +*They create frustration
 +*Since they are wasting time, they waste money<ref>SMART Technology. (2004). The State of Meetings Today. Effective Meetings. Retrieved November 22, 2011, from www.effectivemeetings.com/meetingbasics/meetstate.asp</ref>
 + 
'''Community Development:''' '''Community Development:'''

Revision as of 21:31, 24 November 2011

MediaWiki has been successfully installed.

Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.

Contents

Meeting Management and Working with Work Groups

Description of the Technique

Definition of Working Groups: Researchers working together through a series of activities to help benefit and bring about results that help bring understanding and possible conclusions to the research. Working groups are used to elaborate, consolidate, and build on the consensus of the decision makers; and to ensure coordination among the various segments of the organization, through a shared commitment to work together to clarify issues, formulate strategies, and develop action plan.[1]

Definition of Meeting Management: The process of planning, monitoring and coordinating all components of a meeting including date, destination, venue, invitations, registration, speakers, agenda planning, time keeping, and facilitation[2].

Background of the Technique: Over the years meetings developed a bad reputation for being long, boring and sometimes pointless. On average researchers found that professionals attend 61 meetings per month and also found that around half the time spent in those meetings is wasted. This means that around 30 hours a month is wasted which is time that could be used to be doing actual work. Some problems with meetings are:

  • Meetings are long, inefficient, and generate few results
  • With so much time spent in meetings, employees have less time to finish their own work
  • They create frustration
  • Since they are wasting time, they waste money[3]


Community Development:

Example of Technique:


Application

When should your technique be used: It is difficult to determine when to have a meeting. One must make sure that there are open spaces on their calendars so that they can fully commit to a meeting. One must also remember that there are two reasons to decide to have meeting. These reasons include:

  • 1. Information flow and perpetuating relationships of partnership or teamwork[4].
  • 2. The first step (information flow) is sometimes overlooked or “overkilled.” It is overlooked when managers assume employees can get the information they need, or should take the initiative to ask for the information, if they want to know something. It is “overkill” when a manager brings everyone together to discuss or listen to information about everything. When both of these things occur they are ineffective and inappropriate[5].

Who should it be used by: Meetings should be used by everyone either in business or social settings. Meetings occur in communities, schools, town facilities, organizations, recreational facilities, and many more. A meeting is an element used within a charity to raise money, they can also be used in certain social events such as fundraisers, school committees, dances and many more[6].

Who should it be used with: Everyone should attend a meeting that the meeting pertains to. The objective of the meeting or the main goal will be better attained by the audience if there is a vast amount of individuals who attend.

Examples of when this technique has been used in a community/group setting:

1. For our project while running practice sessions, we used this technique to run these practice sessions and workshops

2. Been used by Brock University Recreation Services (having a meeting with their employees). At these meetings, employees discussed what improvements and changes that they feel Brock needs in order to provide better experiences for Brock students.


Procedure [7]

1. Is it necessary for the meeting to happen?

  • Be able to define the purpose of the meeting in 1 or 2 sentences at most.
  • If you are unable to determine the purpose of the meeting, don't have a meeting.

2. Setting Objectives

  • If you are able to define the purpose, set objectives.
  • When setting the objectives, consider what is the meeting for and what outcomes you want.
  • Your objectives reflective what you want to achieve by the end of the meeting.

3. Developing Agendas

  • All meetings should have an agenda that includes the purpose, the items that are going to be reviewed/discussedinspected.
  • When planning an agenda develop the time limits for each topic to be discussed.
  • Think about what the overall outcome is for the meetings and what activities need to happen to reach these outcomes.
  • Send out the agenda to all participants to view the agenda before the meeting to ensure there are no surprises.

4. Opening Meetings

  • Always start on time.
  • Identify and clarify the participants roles in the meeting (see below: 8 roles in meetings).
  • Review the agenda.

5. Establish Ground Rules or Expectations for Meeting Participants

  • It is important that the whole group agrees on rules.
  • Ground rules improve a groups ability to work as a group.
  • Can focus on these issues:
    • The purpose of the meetings
    • Definition of significant or ambiguous terms
    • Time lines for meetings, length of meetings, meeting schedule
    • Meeting leadership and other roles
    • Expectation for participation and attendance
    • How decisions/actions will be recorded
    • How decisions will be made (consensus, affirmation, or voting)
    • The value of expressing different perspectives, how disagreements should be expressed and handled
    • Method of handling communication with those outside the work group

6. Time Management

  • Keep the meeting moving.
  • One role a group member takes is timekeeper, to ensure group stays on tasks during the meeting.

7. Closing Meetings

  • Always end meetings on time.
  • Meetings should end on a positive note.
  • All group members that a report will be sent out within a week of the meeting.

8 Roles in Meetings [8]

1. Participants: Show up and be present; bring a cooperative, open-minded attitude; and do their best to make good decisions together.

2. Sponsor/Presenter: Thinks in advance about what exactly needs to happen at the meeting, everyone’s time is saved.

3. Agenda Planner: The gatekeeper of the meeting and has the responsibility to ensure that the group’s time is well used.

4. Facilitator: The process guide of the group.

5. Notetaker: Records the information readers will likely want to know (i.e. date/time of meeting, who was present, title of each topic discussed, main points, decisions and next steps).

6. Timekeeper: Keeps an eye on the clock, and should warn the group well before the time for each item runs out.

7. Doorkeeper: Sits near the door to welcome latecomers, and orient them as to what’s happening in the meeting so that they are up to speed and can participate without disruption.

8. Vibeswatcher: Keeps an eye on group energy and dynamics and intervenes when emotions run high, the group needs a break, and so on.


Each time our group met to discuss a practice session or our workshop, we all took on different meeting roles. We noticed that taking on these roles allowed us to have more efficient meetings. These roles allowed us to stay focus and on topic during our meeting. Each member of our group took on a role that they felt comfortable with. This ensured that no one had to step out of their comfort zone and allowed a judgement-free atmosphere which allowed our group members the opportunity to voice their thoughts and opinions.


Video How to Run an Effective Meeting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSft2OeMmzQ


Technique Strengths [9]

  • Allow members to exchange information about new and ongoing work in the community
  • Gives everyone a responsibility; everyone takes on a role
  • Encourage ownership
  • Encourage sharing of ideas and opinions
  • Provide opportunity for honest conversation
  • Facilitate sharing of resources and skills
  • Foster rapport and an environment of trust among the group


As a group we implemented three practice sessions which taught us a lot about this technique. We noticed there were many strengths of meeting management which we began focusing on during our practice sessions. After we finished our first practice session we noticed that providing the opportunity for all participants to voice their thoughts and opinions about meeting management created a positive working group.


Technique Limitations [10]

  • If specific roles are assigned, not everyone’s voices are heard
  • Can be time-consuming
  • Can lead to individuals being side-tracked and losing focus
  • Poor attendance at meetings
  • Focuses on the day-to-day vs. the big picture
  • Members tend not to prepare for meetings
  • Members are "not on the same page"
  • There can be lack of confidentiality
  • No diversity of opinions, race, gender, age, geography
  • Lack of succession planning


As we completed each practice session, we came together as a group and talked about the weakeness that occured during each meeting. We noticed that our participants did not come to our practice sessions with any knowledge about meeting management which left them unprepared and at time unfocused.


Tips for Successful Implementation

  • Be prepared
  • Divide up roles during a management meeting
  • Schedule/Agenda (stay on topic)
  • Productivity of meetings (are they really necessary)
  • Limit points said
  • Have material written down/available to others to read easily

Notes and References

  1. UNCHS & UNEP, Nairobi (2009). Establishing and Supporting a Working Group Process. 3. Retrieved from on November 2, 2011 from: http://www.polytechnic.edu.na/academics/schools/engine_infotech/civil/libraries/urban_planning/Urban%20Planning%20Tools_Stakeholder%20Working%20Group.htm
  2. Cvent. (2001). Meeting Management. Cvent Event Survey & eMarketing Solutions. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.cvent.com/en/resources/meeting-management.shtml
  3. SMART Technology. (2004). The State of Meetings Today. Effective Meetings. Retrieved November 22, 2011, from www.effectivemeetings.com/meetingbasics/meetstate.asp
  4. TrubyAchievements. (2011). Meeting Management. Truby Achievements. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.trubyachievements.com/article-meeting-management.html
  5. TrubyAchievements. (2011). Meeting Management. Truby Achievements. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.trubyachievements.com/article-meeting-management.html
  6. Goodall, H. L., Goodall, S., & Schiefelbein, J. (2010). Business and professional communication in the global workplace (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Pub..
  7. Internet2. (2011). Working Groups: Meeting Management. Internet2. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.internet2.edu/wg/meeting-management.html
  8. Bressen, T. (2004). Group Facilitation Site. Tree Bressen - Facilitator. Retrieved November 22, 2011, from http://treegroup.info/
  9. Internet2. (2011). Working Groups: Meeting Management. Internet2. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.internet2.edu/wg/meeting-management.html
  10. Artswave. (2011). Board Strenghts and Weaknesses. Virtual Arts Incubator. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.artsincubator.org/governance/strengths-and-weaknesses

External Links

Howo. (2006). How to: Run a successful meeting | Howo’s Tip of the Day. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://tipoftheday.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/how-to-run-a-successful-meeting/

Mind Tools. (2011). Running Effective Meetings - Communication Skills Training. Management Training, Leadership Training and Career Training. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.mindtools.com/CommSkll/RunningMeetings.htm


Authors

Ali, Sheileen, Cara, Eric, Steph and Keolani

Personal tools
Bookmark and Share