2009 Day 3 Group Status

From OUCEL Wiki

Revision as of 15:49, 14 August 2009 (edit) Dpvukovic (Talk | contribs) (New page: -Richard Pinet: Our options are: to have overlap of representatives with Trevor’s team (COED – Council of Ontario Educational Developers); invitation to become a member of OCULL (Ontar...) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 15:52, 14 August 2009 (edit) (undo) Dpvukovic (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	-Richard Pinet: Our options are: to have overlap of representatives with Trevor’s team (COED – Council of Ontario Educational Developers); invitation to become a member of OCULL (Ontario Council for University Lifelong Learning); to stay independent, or to find some other way to constitute ourselves.
-	-Cheryl Dickie: There are two questions: a) whether to affiliate or not? b) with whom to affiliate?
-	-Aldo Caputo: There is no cost for us if we affiliate; there is no downside in exploring how the relationship works; suggest pursuing that;
-	-Sandy Hughes: The important question is where we will be more recognized; maybe we should have discussion on where will we be ‘bigger’ players;
	'''Discussion on Group Status'''		'''Discussion on Group Status'''
-	-Richard Pinet: OCULL is framed around continuing education, is OCULL ‘envelope’ big enough for our group;	+	Richard Pinet: Our options are to have overlap of representatives with Trevor’s team (COED – Council of Ontario Educational Developers); invitation to become a member of OCULL (Ontario Council for University Lifelong Learning); to stay independent, or to find some other way to constitute ourselves.
-	- Giulia Forsythe: Many presentations during the Summer Institute mentioned the importance of lifelong learning; e-learning is implicit in lifelong learning; it is not specifically mentioned, but it is there;	+	Cheryl Dickie: There are two questions: a) whether to affiliate or not? b) with whom to affiliate?
-	-Sandy Hughes: If this group wants to pursue this path, I would be surprised if OCULL would not embrace that; this might present opportunity to express ourselves;	+	Aldo Caputo: There is no cost for us if we affiliate; there is no downside in exploring how the relationship works; suggest pursuing that;
-	-Aldo Caputo: I am concerned if we are not on COED group that they can give input without consulting our group;	+	Sandy Hughes: The important question is where we will be more recognized; maybe we should have discussion on where will we be ‘bigger’ players;
-	-Richard Pinet: Could we do both (COED and OCULL)?	+	Richard Pinet: OCULL is framed around continuing education, is OCULL ‘envelope’ big enough for our group;
-	-Linda Murphy-Boyer: There is concern that our institutions will not allow our meetings if we are informal group; we can make a case for membership in both COED and OCULL;	+	Giulia Forsythe: Many presentations during the Summer Institute mentioned the importance of lifelong learning; e-learning is implicit in lifelong learning; it is not specifically mentioned, but it is there;
-	-Cheryl Dickie: Aldo is right – we need to have some relationship with COED group;	+	Sandy Hughes: If this group wants to pursue this path, I would be surprised if OCULL would not embrace that; this might present opportunity to express ourselves;
-	-Linda Murphy-Boyer: If we request formal representations does this give us status?	+	Aldo Caputo: I am concerned if we are not on COED group that they can give input without consulting our group;
-	-Richard Pinet: Yes; we are already OCULL members, so now we will just establish formal relationship;	+	Richard Pinet: Could we do both (COED and OCULL)?
-	- Giulia Forsythe: Do we need to have some executives or just representatives?	+	Linda Murphy-Boyer: There is concern that our institutions will not allow our meetings if we are informal group; we can make a case for membership in both COED and OCULL;
-	-Richard Pinet: We constitute ourselves in relationship to these groups; this way we will be formally seated on these two groups;	+	Cheryl Dickie: Aldo is right – we need to have some relationship with COED group;
-	-Cheryl Dickie: By requesting formal relationship with these groups, these groups will need to ensure and recognize us; if we can achieve formal affiliation; we can work on justification and providing rationale for our institutions;	+	Linda Murphy-Boyer: If we request formal representations does this give us status?
		+	Richard Pinet: Yes; we are already OCULL members, so now we will just establish formal relationship;
-	There's help to be found at http://kumu.brocku.ca/help/Editing -->	+	Giulia Forsythe: Do we need to have some executives or just representatives?
		+
		+	Richard Pinet: We constitute ourselves in relationship to these groups; this way we will be formally seated on these two groups;
		+
		+	Cheryl Dickie: By requesting formal relationship with these groups, these groups will need to ensure and recognize us; if we can achieve formal affiliation; we can work on justification and providing rationale for our institutions;

---

Revision as of 15:52, 14 August 2009

Discussion on Group Status

Richard Pinet: Our options are to have overlap of representatives with Trevor’s team (COED – Council of Ontario Educational Developers); invitation to become a member of OCULL (Ontario Council for University Lifelong Learning); to stay independent, or to find some other way to constitute ourselves.

Cheryl Dickie: There are two questions: a) whether to affiliate or not? b) with whom to affiliate?

Aldo Caputo: There is no cost for us if we affiliate; there is no downside in exploring how the relationship works; suggest pursuing that;

Sandy Hughes: The important question is where we will be more recognized; maybe we should have discussion on where will we be ‘bigger’ players;

Richard Pinet: OCULL is framed around continuing education, is OCULL ‘envelope’ big enough for our group;

Giulia Forsythe: Many presentations during the Summer Institute mentioned the importance of lifelong learning; e-learning is implicit in lifelong learning; it is not specifically mentioned, but it is there;

Sandy Hughes: If this group wants to pursue this path, I would be surprised if OCULL would not embrace that; this might present opportunity to express ourselves;

Aldo Caputo: I am concerned if we are not on COED group that they can give input without consulting our group;

Richard Pinet: Could we do both (COED and OCULL)?

Linda Murphy-Boyer: There is concern that our institutions will not allow our meetings if we are informal group; we can make a case for membership in both COED and OCULL;

Cheryl Dickie: Aldo is right – we need to have some relationship with COED group;

Linda Murphy-Boyer: If we request formal representations does this give us status?

Richard Pinet: Yes; we are already OCULL members, so now we will just establish formal relationship;

Giulia Forsythe: Do we need to have some executives or just representatives?

Richard Pinet: We constitute ourselves in relationship to these groups; this way we will be formally seated on these two groups;

Cheryl Dickie: By requesting formal relationship with these groups, these groups will need to ensure and recognize us; if we can achieve formal affiliation; we can work on justification and providing rationale for our institutions;