A.I. in Special Education

From Digital Culture & Society

---

Revision as of 23:58, 3 December 2023

Article 1: Artificial intelligence in special education: a systematic review [[1]]

Context: In today's educational world, people are talking a lot about how technology and special education come together. This article is essentially all about artificial intelligence (AI) and how it could really change how students with special needs learn, contrary to popular belief. We are looking at how AI literally fits into education, especially for students who need extra help, which is basically significant.

Overview: The article literally looks closely at 29 studies from 2008 to 2020. For the most part, it tries to give a big picture of how AI is used in special education. The main goal is to generally help readers understand all the different ways AI is used in this area. The research looks at things like what subjects are taught, the places where students learn, who the students are, and the types of disabilities they have. The way they study this follows a plan made by Lin and Hwang to make sure it is done carefully and thoroughly.

Strengths and Weaknesses: Now, let us talk about what the article does well and where it could basically be better. The article is good at looking closely at studies and following a careful plan. It uses charts and graphs to make complicated information easier for more people to understand. However, there are some things to think about that are quite significant, particularly. The article might not literally include all the important studies because it only looks at certain databases and articles in English, which is generally significant. Also, it only looks at a small number of articles, mostly from specific databases, which might make it one-sided.

Deeper Analysis: Now, let us go beyond the article, or so they, for the most part, however. It is important to think about what putting AI into special education means in a bigger way. The studies in the article show that people have become much more interested in this topic in the last ten years, showing that education is changing. However, it is tricky because most studies kind of are from the United States. This makes us wonder if AI is being used fairly around the world indefinitely in special education. For future research, it is important to include many more studies from different places to get a complete picture, which is particularly significant. ASSESSMENT: Now, let us sum up what the article does for us. It is like a helpful guide for anyone interested in how AI and special education specifically come together. It is not just for researchers; teachers and people who mostly make rules about education can use it, too. Teachers can learn how AI can help students with different needs, which is particularly significant. Policymakers can use the information to make decisions about how to use technology in schools, which literally is quite significant.

Utility: This article is specifically useful for many people in education. Researchers can use it to plan their studies, getting a good look at what we already actually know. Teachers can use it to really be sort of better at helping all kinds of students learn subtly. Policymakers get much information to, for the most part, help them make smart choices, thinking about how AI and special education work together around the world.

To conclude, this article is literally a big deal in the ongoing conversation about AI and special education in a subtle way. By looking at the whole picture, it becomes an important part of talking about how technology can specifically make education kind of better for all students. As tech gets better, this article is right at the front, helping us figure out how to use AI in education, making sure all students get what they need, or so they thought. The next steps include looking at more places around the world and digging deeper into how, for the most part, AI affects the feelings and behaviours of students with special needs, which is contrary to popular belief.

'Article 2: Special Needs Classroom Assessment Using a Sign Language Communicator (CASC) Based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Techniques.' [[2]]

Context: This article looks at the application of AI in special education, with a focus on Classroom Assessment using Sign Language Communicator (CASC), a noteworthy device. The article supports the general objective of using technology to assist people with special needs when viewed in the context of the larger picture of AI in education. It is generally important to note that the field of AI in education is increasingly concentrated on personalized learning and inclusivity. This article helps by introducing the CASC, a new device designed to facilitate communication and accurate assessment for students with hearing impairments in a big way. It highlights AI's role in developing adaptable and easily accessible learning environments, which is in line with current trends in the field.

Overview: The CASC model, which can essentially translate spoken language into sign language and vice versa, is introduced at the beginning of the article, which is fairly significant. The authors, for the most part, provide a step-by-step explanation of the research process while emphasizing the significance of indirect assessment via student surveys. They specifically thought about how the CASC model is developed and applied to students with special needs, particularly those who have hearing impairments. They go into great detail about this. The article's major objective is to demonstrate how, for the most part, the CASC model—which is driven by AI and machine learning—can subtly revolutionize special education.

Strengths and Weaknesses: The article's thorough explanation of the CASC model, from its development to its very useful application, is one of its very strong points. The technical aspects, such as using AI for speech recognition, natural language processing, and sign language recognition, are thoroughly outlined by the authors. The article actually is somewhat applicable and definitely clear because it includes real-world examples as well as a sample of the CASC database. A flaw in the paper, though, is how little it addresses the difficulties and possible problems with the CASC model—a particularly important problem. Although it places a fairly strong emphasis on successful outcomes and student satisfaction, a more in-depth examination of the limitations—such as the effects of inadequate lighting or students hiding their emotions—would ultimately offer a fairly more balanced viewpoint.

Assessment: Teachers, technologists, and legislators who are interested in the relationship between AI and special education will find this article to be extremely helpful. It is a useful manual for comprehending how specifically AI resources, such as the CASC model, can undoubtedly be applied in special education settings. The CASC model is offered as a creative way to encourage inclusivity in educational settings because of its emphasis on real-time assessment and sign language communication, contrary to popular belief. This article will be beneficial to educators who want to literally learn more about how to use AI for personalized learning, particularly for students who have hearing impairments, which is fairly significant. The CASC model offers insights into overcoming obstacles faced by special, mostly needs students, making it a valuable tool for institutions looking to implement inclusive educational technologies.

To conclude, by presenting a useful application in the form of the CASC model, this paper considerably advances the conversation about artificial intelligence in special education. It is important to acknowledge that, despite its strengths in technological innovation and practical application, further research is undoubtedly needed to fully understand any potential drawbacks and make improvements for generally wider adoption. For the most part, the CASC model serves as concrete evidence of the transformative power of AI in fostering more inclusive and productive learning environments for students with special needs.

Article 3: The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Special Education Technology [[3]]

Context: The article titled "Artificial Intelligence in Special Education: Considerations and Implications" is essentially an important addition to the ongoing discussions about using artificial intelligence (AI) in special education, which is quite significant. In the bigger picture, AI in education is advancing quickly, and this article focuses on how it definitely fits into the world of platform technology, which is fairly significant. It aligns with new ideas that literally highlight how, essentially, AI tools like ChatGPT can change education, especially for students with different abilities, in a subtle way.

Overview: Delving into the World of AI in Very Special Education The article takes a pretty deep dive into the effects, challenges, and ethical questions that essentially come with using AI in special education. The article's outline covers various crucial aspects, such as:

• The Current State of AI in Education: Looking at how, for the most part, AI is currently used in education and how it could actually be special education, which essentially is fairly significant.

• Addressing Concerns: Tackling worries about biases, privacy issues, and ethical problems connected to AI tools like ChatGPT in a major way.

• AI's Role in Personalized Instruction: Exploring how AI can particularly help with customized teaching and developing generally advanced thinking skills.

• Considerations for sort of Higher Education: Providing things to generally think about for sort of higher education and preparing personnel considering the progress of essentially AI in a particularly major way.

• Policy Implications: Discuss how policies should really consider data privacy, ethical use, and rules about AI technologies, which is quite significant.

Strengths and Weaknesses: The article shines in its detailed coverage of various aspects related to AI in special education. It effectively points out the general potential benefits of AI tools, like personalized instruction and support for different learners. It also contributes to the ongoing conversation about ethics and policies, giving valuable insights in a sort of major way. However, the article's weakness is that it does not actually explore very practical uses and real-life examples, making it definitely more theoretical than practical, which is basically quite significant.

Assessment: This article really is a great resource for educators, policymakers, and researchers trying to actually understand the basically complex world of AI in special education, which is quite significant. It particularly lays the foundation for understanding the challenges and opportunities of using definitely AI tools, providing a roadmap for future considerations in a pretty big way. Educators can use it to learn about AI's potential for personalized instruction, while policymakers can use it to shape rules that make fairly sure AI is used responsibly in education, which literally is fairly significant.

Usefulness: The article is a useful tool for those wanting to grasp the ethical, policy, and practical aspects of integrating AI in special education in a subtle way. It guides educators in preparing for the future, stressing the need for a careful approach that considers students' diverse needs, or so they generally thought. Policymakers can benefit from the article's insights into potential risks and the rules needed to protect data privacy and ensure ethics, particularly AI use.

To conclude, "Artificial Intelligence in Definitely Special Education: Considerations and Implications" significantly contributes to the ongoing discussion about the future of AI in all intents of special education, generally contrary to popular belief. Its in-depth exploration, along with insights into ethical considerations and policy implications, specifically makes it a valuable resource for those invested in the intersection of general AI and special education, which is fairly significant.