RECL 3P25 Fall 2011 - Group 08 - Participatory Rural Appraisal:About

From RECL 3P25 Fall 2011 - Group 08 - Participatory Rural Appraisal

Revision as of 20:04, 24 November 2011 (edit) Kk09iz (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 20:17, 24 November 2011 (edit) (undo) Kk09iz (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	'''Steps for Implementing PRA'''		'''Steps for Implementing PRA'''
		+
		+	Step 1: PRA facilitator coordinates meeting.
		+	Step 2: Have a central meeting location and time that everyone in the community is aware of.
		+	Step 3: Have resources available for communication (writing utensils, pictures, diagrams, paper, etc)
		+	Step 4: PRA facilitator guide community meeting to ensure proper use of the technique.
		+	Step 5: Review the collaborated resources.
		+
		+	'''Pros and Cons of PRA'''
		+	Pros:
		+	-No one reason for implementing it
		+	-Meets the needs of any individual despite barriers
		+	-Uses ideas and knowledge of individuals within the community
		+	-Empowers individuals to community stewardship
		+
		+	Cons:
		+	-No one reason for implementing it
		+	-Not generally used in developed countries
		+	-Hard concept to grasp
		+	-No follow up method
		+
		+

---

Revision as of 20:17, 24 November 2011

Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA):

Is a technique used for gathering information on community resources and needs for use in literacy and community development programs.

Participatory Rural Appraisal has several uses and can be applied in several forms. Most commonly it is used by NGOs in rural areas of developing countries where there are language barriers, such as English not being the native language reducing the effectiveness and ease of verbal communication between facilitators and community members. Other barriers that this technique addresses are low literacy levels amongst participants, because it incorporates the use of visual aids and communication through actions to involve participants and share information rather than using written exercises.

Key Concepts of PRA:

It is a method of gathering data about community needs. IT is a method of inclusion through getting input and using the knowledge and skills of all community members. A method of using no verbal communication methods to determine needs and wants of the community members. A method of creating localization by using by using local resources, materials and people to help work towards community development. It is a method of influencing empowerment by encouraging participation and the self sustainability of community development through the active participation and facilitation by community members themselves. Giving citizens the means to take control and ownership for themselves.

Techniques of the PRA Process:

Group Dynamics, eg. learning contracts, role reversals, feedback sessions. Sampling, eg. transect walks, wealth ranking, social mapping. Interviewing, eg. focus group discussions, semi-structured interviews, triangulation. Visualization, eg. venn diagrams, matrix socring, timelines.

Steps for Implementing PRA

Step 1: PRA facilitator coordinates meeting. Step 2: Have a central meeting location and time that everyone in the community is aware of. Step 3: Have resources available for communication (writing utensils, pictures, diagrams, paper, etc) Step 4: PRA facilitator guide community meeting to ensure proper use of the technique. Step 5: Review the collaborated resources.

Pros and Cons of PRA Pros: -No one reason for implementing it -Meets the needs of any individual despite barriers -Uses ideas and knowledge of individuals within the community -Empowers individuals to community stewardship

Cons: -No one reason for implementing it -Not generally used in developed countries -Hard concept to grasp -No follow up method