Report to COED
From OUCEL Wiki
Revision as of 12:15, 13 November 2008 (edit) 139.57.153.173 (Talk) (→Disadvantages of Merging) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 12:17, 13 November 2008 (edit) (undo) 139.57.153.173 (Talk) (→Discussion Points) Next diff → |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Discussion Points== | ==Discussion Points== | ||
- | *Richard asked local OUCEL reps who are also members of EDC to attend the EDC/COED group meeting to address this with the larger group | + | *Richard Pinet (University of Ottawa) asked local OUCEL reps who are also members of EDC to attend the EDC/COED group meeting to address this with the larger group |
- | *Aldo Caputo ( | + | *Aldo Caputo (University of Waterloo), Sandy Hughes (Wilfrid Laurier University) and Giulia Forsythe (Brock) agreed to attend the November 14, 2008 meeting at Ryerson |
#Is EDC/COED still moving towards affiliate status without the MOU? | #Is EDC/COED still moving towards affiliate status without the MOU? |
Revision as of 12:17, 13 November 2008
Contents |
Purpose
The Ontario Universities’ Council on e-Learning (OUCEL) is a working group of the Council of Ontario Universities that provides leadership regarding e-learning. Representatives on OUCEL are committed to e-learning that enhances student learning and engagement. OUCEL further encourages a scholarly approach towards e-learning in relation to teaching, research, and service – core values of Ontario Universities.
History
- OPAS Summer institute
- VPA appointed e-learning rep
- communications via COU portal
- The initial reps (Richard Pinet, Denise Stockley) had been approached by Jan Donio who was the COU/OPAS rep. They were asked to see if there was an interest to generate a group of reps from various Teaching and Technology Centres across Ontario to see if they would be interested in seeking COU affiliate status (an e-Learning affiliate as we later characterized ourselves). This invitation was accepted, and as such, received a positive response from all reps of the COU Universities. Our group has met several times, we have created a Terms of Reference and have had very fruitful discussions across a number of issues - including possible collaborative projects.
Meetings
Follow-up from Summer Institute 2008
Richard Pinet, chair of OUCEL sent the following synopsis regarding OUCEL and Next Steps which included a link to a survey about the direction the OUCEL group desired.
Votes
Seventeen institutions voted, with results as follows:
- 41.2% (7 responses)- a) explore with EDC/COED group possible affiliation with them as full partners
- 41.2% (7 responses)- b) explore with EDC/COED group having reps from our group sit on their governing body
- 17.6% (3 responses)- c) not seek any arrangement with EDC/COED and pursue our own arrangements with OCAV
and COU, independent of the newly formed EDC group
Discussion Points
- Richard Pinet (University of Ottawa) asked local OUCEL reps who are also members of EDC to attend the EDC/COED group meeting to address this with the larger group
- Aldo Caputo (University of Waterloo), Sandy Hughes (Wilfrid Laurier University) and Giulia Forsythe (Brock) agreed to attend the November 14, 2008 meeting at Ryerson
- Is EDC/COED still moving towards affiliate status without the MOU?
- If so, how (if at all) does EDC/COED envision itself with technology and teaching
- Does EDC/COED welcome representation or full partnership?
Arguments For and Against
- Dichotomy between technology and pedagogy
- Home for technology innovation and implementation sometimes housed in purely administrative units, not linked to pedagogy (i.e. registration and finance systems)
- Many teaching and learning centres have closely integrated technology into their pedagogy (i.e. learning management systems)
Benefits of Merging
- Many teaching and learning centres have closely integrated technology into their pedagogy (i.e. learning management systems, wikis, blogs, second life, etc.)
- Many issues related to technology are deeply rooted in pedagogy; use of video lectures, supplemental learning resources, use of dispersed learning methods. If they aren't already deeply rooted, shouldn't they be?
Disadvantages of Merging
- Some issues faced by technology reps are purely administrative and do not necessarily affect pedagogy
- Some concerns from OUCEL members that e-learning will not receive the full amount of attention it requires
- Is elearning a form of educational development? Are members of OUCEL involved in educational development? Do we have enough in common to form one group?
- Is EDO/COED too large already? Would more representatives become too unmanageable?