Difference between revisions of "Day 2"

From OUCEL Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 46: Line 46:
  
  
 +
 +
 +
==10:15-11 Andre Quenneville from ORION - IPTV==
 +
 +
Director of Public Affairs, Ontario Research Innovation Optical Network
 +
 +
===What is Orion?===
 +
*Owned & operated by not-for-profit entity comprised of college & uni presidents
 +
*Next generation research & education network
 +
*equipment in 21 cities, hosted at college & uni campuses
 +
*private network apart of a global grid of R&E networks (CAN- CANARIE) and internationally
 +
*supports high bandwitch, low latency applications, i.e. HD quality video conference, multicasting, etc.
 +
*Lakehead has deployed Google Apps for Enterprise Education
 +
 +
===Context for ORION===
 +
*unconstrained bandwith
 +
*supporting virtual classrooms
 +
*sharing large datasets (terabyes
 +
* collaborate real-time
 +
*75 members and growing, traffic up 600%
 +
*new initiatives;
 +
**e.g. medical imagine,
 +
**virtual classrooms,
 +
**distributed computing
 +
**student television (affiliated with Internet2, Case Western, Cleveland, Ohio)
 +
***streamed live over a channel, multi-cast enabled
 +
***content, news, documentaries, performance works, lectures, podcasts, news, sports events, entertainment programming etc.
 +
***http://www.orion.on.ca/orionstudenttv.html
 +
 +
discussion paper URL available at:TBA
 +
 +
 +
===Vision for an IPTV platform===
 +
*something like this exists already- OSTN (US)
 +
*ORION took the lead in developing a Discussion Paper and online survey (serve as a catalyst)
 +
*Sheridan agreed to partner with ORION to stage a workshop and provide support
 +
*Institutions were asking, "why can't we have our own media streaming, animation, film programs, etc"?
 +
*A lot of content being produced but not shared
 +
*Ontario has some of the world leading film and animation schools, leverage to showcase and provide a platform to make available internally and externally to industry, parents and the community
 +
*Provide students, educators, researchers, teaching institutions and partners with a broadly accessible tool for posting, distributing and sharing
 +
* enhance the platform with interactive and web 2.0 capabilities
 +
*platform for collaboration
 +
 +
===Benefits===
 +
*network of channels
 +
*global showcase for Ontario's and Canada's excellence in producing digital media, film, TV
 +
-R&D platform delivering test-bed capabilities for reseach in advanced media technologies and application, i.e. content for mobile devices, next-generation interactive media
 +
*living lab environment
 +
 +
===Current Situation===
 +
*looked at what schools are doing today
 +
*what happens to content
 +
*reviewed 20 initiatives, variety of approaches and objectives,
 +
====Content and programming====
 +
*campus-wide student activities
 +
*tools to create content relevant to student experiences
 +
*programming information that students need about campus event and activities
 +
*lecture content on web, studies and exam prep, engage deeply in coursework
 +
*broadcast, film, animation and media programs need to keep apce with rapid avanes in the industry like http://youtube.com
 +
*research into content creation
 +
*content for wireless devices
 +
*support for internal and external marketing and recruitment and outreach activities
 +
**e.g. Fanshawe college allowing students to post information about the college
 +
 +
===Technology, Platform & infrastructure===
 +
*Hosted websites
 +
*Proprietary broacast platforms, G-Channel, V-Brick, etc.
 +
*Broadcast through local cable
 +
*Publicly available apps, like iTunes, Ustream, etc
 +
*INUK Netorks
 +
*Open Student Television Netork (OSTN)
 +
 +
 +
===Operations, management & funding===
 +
*critical mass?
 +
*resource challenges?
 +
*production facilities
 +
*appropriate rights management framework?
 +
 +
==Survey Findings==
 +
===Highlights===
 +
*seems to be sufficient support
 +
*39 institutions participated
 +
*67% have or plan to distrubete student , faculty and/or inst. generated content
 +
*72% feel it would be valuable
 +
 +
==Workshop at Sheridan==
 +
*Hosted at Sheridan - June 18, 19
 +
*Over 100 people participated, representing colleges, unis, industry, gov, and otehr stakeholders
 +
*showcase and exhibitors June 18

Revision as of 11:03, 14 August 2008

9:15-10:15AM- James Skidmore, UW: “Prof Moments: a video alternative to lecture-casts”

Before Prof-Moments

  • taking notes from an oral Skidmore lecture- Nietzsche contra Wagner
  • difficult to just take notes orally; podcasting audio may not be sufficient
  • Learning Styles important
  • created "Prof Moments"
  • with the consultation from the LT3 centre

Example of Prof Moments

  • example lecture with "Prof Moments" (video & handout); text in [uwace.uwaterloo.ca UW ACE], some readings available:
  • edited videos himself using Camtasia Studio, tablet computer, speak to slides, record with minimal editing, exported to "swf" (flash video)
  • notes are taken on "handout pdf" of powerpoint
  • Skidmore: feels the repetition of listening, watching and notetaking increases learning; in "contact" with the information
  • difficult to multi-task (rollerblade and note-take)
  • assignments- virtual field trip; off into web sites - achieve tasks - they are getting a good introduction
  • provides structure for students
  • 9 units, 40 "prof moments"

Results

  • course evaluations indicate the students like humour, informality,
  • vice into virtue

Questions

  • How much time does this take?
    • has 6 TAs to assist
    • each semester takes a bit of time to get it ready
    • took a lot of time to get permissions
  • Have you considered teaching this blended, hybrid mix of face to face and then showing the prof moments
    • yes, perhaps. Has not taught the course face to face for a while. Is keen on letting students taking control of their learning
  • What was different between face to face that DE didn't get?
    • showed similar but different examples
    • posed questions, in class group work (some students resist group work)
    • attendance drops off in all large lecture classes near the end of the term
    • not much value-added to meet face to face?
    • perhaps expand or elaborate; still searching
  • Did face to face to students do better than DE?
    • No, they did the same
    • difficult to control
  • Where do you see your self on the "techno-saaviness" scale?
    • Not a real adventurer, but perhaps better than the "average". Tend to stick with what's there; easily available; using UW ACE; able to assist peers
  • Had you seen "prof moment" content that inspired you?
    • Les from UW gave an example of Breeze, introduced James to the idea
    • download Word, markup with Word with a tablet, resubmit back as a PDF
  • Little effort vs. Time consuming?

[email protected]


10:15-11 Andre Quenneville from ORION - IPTV

Director of Public Affairs, Ontario Research Innovation Optical Network

What is Orion?

  • Owned & operated by not-for-profit entity comprised of college & uni presidents
  • Next generation research & education network
  • equipment in 21 cities, hosted at college & uni campuses
  • private network apart of a global grid of R&E networks (CAN- CANARIE) and internationally
  • supports high bandwitch, low latency applications, i.e. HD quality video conference, multicasting, etc.
  • Lakehead has deployed Google Apps for Enterprise Education

Context for ORION

  • unconstrained bandwith
  • supporting virtual classrooms
  • sharing large datasets (terabyes
  • collaborate real-time
  • 75 members and growing, traffic up 600%
  • new initiatives;
    • e.g. medical imagine,
    • virtual classrooms,
    • distributed computing
    • student television (affiliated with Internet2, Case Western, Cleveland, Ohio)
      • streamed live over a channel, multi-cast enabled
      • content, news, documentaries, performance works, lectures, podcasts, news, sports events, entertainment programming etc.
      • http://www.orion.on.ca/orionstudenttv.html

discussion paper URL available at:TBA


Vision for an IPTV platform

  • something like this exists already- OSTN (US)
  • ORION took the lead in developing a Discussion Paper and online survey (serve as a catalyst)
  • Sheridan agreed to partner with ORION to stage a workshop and provide support
  • Institutions were asking, "why can't we have our own media streaming, animation, film programs, etc"?
  • A lot of content being produced but not shared
  • Ontario has some of the world leading film and animation schools, leverage to showcase and provide a platform to make available internally and externally to industry, parents and the community
  • Provide students, educators, researchers, teaching institutions and partners with a broadly accessible tool for posting, distributing and sharing
  • enhance the platform with interactive and web 2.0 capabilities
  • platform for collaboration

Benefits

  • network of channels
  • global showcase for Ontario's and Canada's excellence in producing digital media, film, TV

-R&D platform delivering test-bed capabilities for reseach in advanced media technologies and application, i.e. content for mobile devices, next-generation interactive media

  • living lab environment

Current Situation

  • looked at what schools are doing today
  • what happens to content
  • reviewed 20 initiatives, variety of approaches and objectives,

Content and programming

  • campus-wide student activities
  • tools to create content relevant to student experiences
  • programming information that students need about campus event and activities
  • lecture content on web, studies and exam prep, engage deeply in coursework
  • broadcast, film, animation and media programs need to keep apce with rapid avanes in the industry like http://youtube.com
  • research into content creation
  • content for wireless devices
  • support for internal and external marketing and recruitment and outreach activities
    • e.g. Fanshawe college allowing students to post information about the college

Technology, Platform & infrastructure

  • Hosted websites
  • Proprietary broacast platforms, G-Channel, V-Brick, etc.
  • Broadcast through local cable
  • Publicly available apps, like iTunes, Ustream, etc
  • INUK Netorks
  • Open Student Television Netork (OSTN)


Operations, management & funding

  • critical mass?
  • resource challenges?
  • production facilities
  • appropriate rights management framework?

Survey Findings

Highlights

  • seems to be sufficient support
  • 39 institutions participated
  • 67% have or plan to distrubete student , faculty and/or inst. generated content
  • 72% feel it would be valuable

Workshop at Sheridan

  • Hosted at Sheridan - June 18, 19
  • Over 100 people participated, representing colleges, unis, industry, gov, and otehr stakeholders
  • showcase and exhibitors June 18