|
|
| (18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Purpose== | + | =Update on 2016 OUCeL Activities= |
| − | The Ontario Universities’ Council on e-Learning (OUCEL) is a working group of the Council of Ontario Universities that provides leadership regarding e-learning. Representatives on OUCEL are committed to e-learning that enhances student learning and engagement. OUCEL further encourages a scholarly approach towards e-learning in relation to teaching, research, and service – core values of Ontario Universities.
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==History==
| + | <videoflash> https://youtu.be/NKY7INnEkE0</videoflash> |
| − | *OPAS Summer institute
| + | *Created by Giulia Forsythe |
| − | *VPA appointed e-learning rep
| + | *[http://bit.ly/2eJpiBa Slides available online] |
| − | *communications via [https://portal.cou.ca COU portal]
| + | [[Category:OUCeL]] |
| − | *The initial reps (Richard Pinet, Denise Stockley) had been approached by Jan Donio who was the COU/OPAS rep. They were asked to see if there was an interest to generate a group of reps from various Teaching and Technology Centres across Ontario to see if they would be interested in seeking COU affiliate status (an e-Learning affiliate as we later characterized ourselves). This invitation was accepted, and as such, received a positive response from all reps of the COU Universities. Our group has met several times, we have created a Terms of Reference and have had very fruitful discussions across a number of issues - including possible collaborative projects. | |
| − | | |
| − | ==Meetings==
| |
| − | *[[Summer Institute 2008]] | |
| − | *[[Fall Meeting 2007]]
| |
| − | *[[Summer Institute 2007]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Follow-up from Summer Institute 2008==
| |
| − | Richard Pinet, chair of OUCEL sent the following synopsis regarding [[OUCEL and Next Steps]] which included a link to a survey about the direction the OUCEL group desired.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Votes==
| |
| − | Seventeen institutions voted, with results as follows:
| |
| − | *41.2% (7 responses)- a) explore with EDC/COED group possible affiliation with them as full partners
| |
| − | *41.2% (7 responses)- b) explore with EDC/COED group having reps from our group sit on their governing body
| |
| − | *17.6% (3 responses)- c) not seek any arrangement with EDC/COED and pursue our own arrangements with OCAV
| |
| − | and COU, independent of the newly formed EDC group
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==Discussion Points==
| |
| − | *Richard asked local OUCEL reps who are also members of EDC to attend the EDC/COED group meeting to address this with the larger group
| |
| − | *Aldo Caputo (UWaterloo), Sandy Hughes (Laurier) and Giulia (Brock) agreed to attend the November 14, 2008 meeting at Ryerson
| |
| − | | |
| − | #Is EDC/COED still moving towards affiliate status without the MOU?
| |
| − | #If so, how (if at all) does EDC/COED envision itself with technology and teaching
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Arguments For and Against==
| |
| − | *Dichotomy between technology and pedagogy
| |
| − | **Home for technology innovation and implementation sometimes housed in purely administrative units, not linked to pedagogy (i.e. registration and finance systems)
| |
| − | **Many teaching and learning centres have closely integrated technology into their pedagogy (i.e. learning management systems)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Benefits of Merging===
| |
| − | *Many teaching and learning centres have closely integrated technology into their pedagogy (i.e. learning management systems)
| |
| − | *Some issues related to technology are deeply rooted in pedagogy; use of video lectures, supplemental learning resources, use of dispersed learning methods
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Disadvantages of Merging===
| |
| − | *Some issues faced by technology reps are purely administrative and do not necessarily affect pedagogy
| |
| − | *Some concerns from OUCEL members that e-learning will not receive the full amount of attention it requires
| |
| − | *Is elearning a form of educational development? Are members of OUCEL involved in educational development? Do we have enough in common to form a
| |
| − | *Is EDO/COED too large already? Can more representatives become too unmanageable?
| |
