Difference between revisions of "LMS/CMS: a) supporting b) investigating/changing: Patrick Lyons"
(New page: The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at t...) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at the University by inviting users of different LMS at other universities to talk directly about strengths and weaknesses of LMS to the committee; it was much better than starting with vendors because the discussion was more open about each of the LMS. | + | *The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at the University by inviting users of different LMS at other universities to talk directly about strengths and weaknesses of LMS to the committee; it was much better than starting with vendors because the discussion was more open about each of the LMS. |
| + | [[Category:OUCeL]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:09, 25 September 2024
- The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at the University by inviting users of different LMS at other universities to talk directly about strengths and weaknesses of LMS to the committee; it was much better than starting with vendors because the discussion was more open about each of the LMS.
