LMS/CMS: a) supporting b) investigating/changing: Patrick Lyons - Revision history

Mclare at 15:09, 25 September 2024

2024-09-25T15:09:54Z

99.240.139.204 at 02:04, 15 August 2009

2009-08-15T02:04:38Z

Dpvukovic: New page: The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at t...

2009-08-14T16:54:16Z

New page: The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at t...

New page

The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at the University by inviting users of different LMS at other universities to talk directly about strengths and weaknesses of LMS to the committee; it was much better than starting with vendors because the discussion was more open about each of the LMS.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 25 September 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at the University by inviting users of different LMS at other universities to talk directly about strengths and weaknesses of LMS to the committee; it was much better than starting with vendors because the discussion was more open about each of the LMS.		*The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at the University by inviting users of different LMS at other universities to talk directly about strengths and weaknesses of LMS to the committee; it was much better than starting with vendors because the discussion was more open about each of the LMS.
		+	[[Category:OUCeL]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 15 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at the University by inviting users of different LMS at other universities to talk directly about strengths and weaknesses of LMS to the committee; it was much better than starting with vendors because the discussion was more open about each of the LMS.	+	*The group has been talking about Carleton experience with LMS committee and the process of evaluating LMS products; we talked about setting expectations both at the committee but also at the University by inviting users of different LMS at other universities to talk directly about strengths and weaknesses of LMS to the committee; it was much better than starting with vendors because the discussion was more open about each of the LMS.