2009 Day 3 Group Status - Revision history

Mclare at 15:20, 25 September 2024

2024-09-25T15:20:27Z

99.240.139.204 at 02:22, 15 August 2009

2009-08-15T02:22:16Z

Dpvukovic at 19:52, 14 August 2009

2009-08-14T19:52:58Z

Dpvukovic at 19:52, 14 August 2009

2009-08-14T19:52:02Z

Dpvukovic: New page: -Richard Pinet: Our options are: to have overlap of representatives with Trevor’s team (COED – Council of Ontario Educational Developers); invitation to become a member of OCULL (Ontar...

2009-08-14T19:49:53Z

New page: -Richard Pinet: Our options are: to have overlap of representatives with Trevor’s team (COED – Council of Ontario Educational Developers); invitation to become a member of OCULL (Ontar...

New page

-Richard Pinet: Our options are: to have overlap of representatives with Trevor’s team (COED – Council of Ontario Educational Developers); invitation to become a member of OCULL (Ontario Council for University Lifelong Learning); to stay independent, or to find some other way to constitute ourselves.
-Cheryl Dickie: There are two questions: a) whether to affiliate or not? b) with whom to affiliate?
-Aldo Caputo: There is no cost for us if we affiliate; there is no downside in exploring how the relationship works; suggest pursuing that;
-Sandy Hughes: The important question is where we will be more recognized; maybe we should have discussion on where will we be ‘bigger’ players;
'''Discussion on Group Status'''

-Richard Pinet: OCULL is framed around continuing education, is OCULL ‘envelope’ big enough for our group;

- Giulia Forsythe: Many presentations during the Summer Institute mentioned the importance of lifelong learning; e-learning is implicit in lifelong learning; it is not specifically mentioned, but it is there;

-Sandy Hughes: If this group wants to pursue this path, I would be surprised if OCULL would not embrace that; this might present opportunity to express ourselves;

-Aldo Caputo: I am concerned if we are not on COED group that they can give input without consulting our group;

-Richard Pinet: Could we do both (COED and OCULL)?

-Linda Murphy-Boyer: There is concern that our institutions will not allow our meetings if we are informal group; we can make a case for membership in both COED and OCULL;

-Cheryl Dickie: Aldo is right – we need to have some relationship with COED group;

-Linda Murphy-Boyer: If we request formal representations does this give us status?

-Richard Pinet: Yes; we are already OCULL members, so now we will just establish formal relationship;

- Giulia Forsythe: Do we need to have some executives or just representatives?

-Richard Pinet: We constitute ourselves in relationship to these groups; this way we will be formally seated on these two groups;

-Cheryl Dickie: By requesting formal relationship with these groups, these groups will need to ensure and recognize us; if we can achieve formal affiliation; we can work on justification and providing rationale for our institutions;

There's help to be found at http://kumu.brocku.ca/help/Editing -->

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 25 September 2024
Line 32:		Line 32:

	*Cheryl Dickie: By requesting formal relationship with these groups, these groups will need to ensure and recognize us; if we can achieve formal affiliation; we can work on justification and providing rationale for our institutions;		*Cheryl Dickie: By requesting formal relationship with these groups, these groups will need to ensure and recognize us; if we can achieve formal affiliation; we can work on justification and providing rationale for our institutions;
		+	[[Category:OUCeL]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Discussion on Group Status'''
--Richard Pinet: Our options are to have overlap of representatives with Trevor’s team (COED – Council of Ontario Educational Developers); invitation to become a member of OCULL (Ontario Council for University Lifelong Learning); to stay independent, or to find some other way to constitute ourselves.
+*Richard Pinet: Our options are to have overlap of representatives with Trevor’s team (COED – Council of Ontario Educational Developers); invitation to become a member of OCULL (Ontario Council for University Lifelong Learning); to stay independent, or to find some other way to constitute ourselves.
--Cheryl Dickie: There are two questions: a) whether to affiliate or not? b) with whom to affiliate?
+*Cheryl Dickie: There are two questions: a) whether to affiliate or not? b) with whom to affiliate?
--Aldo Caputo: There is no cost for us if we affiliate; there is no downside in exploring how the relationship works; suggest pursuing that;
+*Aldo Caputo: There is no cost for us if we affiliate; there is no downside in exploring how the relationship works; suggest pursuing that;
--Sandy Hughes: The important question is where we will be more recognized; maybe we should have discussion on where will we be ‘bigger’ players;
+*Sandy Hughes: The important question is where we will be more recognized; maybe we should have discussion on where will we be ‘bigger’ players;
--Richard Pinet: OCULL is framed around continuing education, is OCULL ‘envelope’ big enough for our group;
+*Richard Pinet: OCULL is framed around continuing education, is OCULL ‘envelope’ big enough for our group;
--Giulia Forsythe: Many presentations during the Summer Institute mentioned the importance of lifelong learning; e-learning is implicit in lifelong learning; it is not specifically mentioned, but it is there;
+*Giulia Forsythe: Many presentations during the Summer Institute mentioned the importance of lifelong learning; e-learning is implicit in lifelong learning; it is not specifically mentioned, but it is there;
--Sandy Hughes: If this group wants to pursue this path, I would be surprised if OCULL would not embrace that; this might present opportunity to express ourselves;
+*Sandy Hughes: If this group wants to pursue this path, I would be surprised if OCULL would not embrace that; this might present opportunity to express ourselves;
--Aldo Caputo: I am concerned if we are not on COED group that they can give input without consulting our group;
+*Aldo Caputo: I am concerned if we are not on COED group that they can give input without consulting our group;
--Richard Pinet: Could we do both (COED and OCULL)?
+*Richard Pinet: Could we do both (COED and OCULL)?
--Linda Murphy-Boyer: There is concern that our institutions will not allow our meetings if we are informal group; we can make a case for membership in both COED and OCULL;
+*Linda Murphy-Boyer: There is concern that our institutions will not allow our meetings if we are informal group; we can make a case for membership in both COED and OCULL;
--Cheryl Dickie: Aldo is right – we need to have some relationship with COED group;
+*Cheryl Dickie: Aldo is right – we need to have some relationship with COED group;
--Linda Murphy-Boyer: If we request formal representations does this give us status?
+*Linda Murphy-Boyer: If we request formal representations does this give us status?
--Richard Pinet: Yes; we are already OCULL members, so now we will just establish formal relationship;
+*Richard Pinet: Yes; we are already OCULL members, so now we will just establish formal relationship;
--Giulia Forsythe: Do we need to have some executives or just representatives?
+*Giulia Forsythe: Do we need to have some executives or just representatives?
--Richard Pinet: We constitute ourselves in relationship to these groups; this way we will be formally seated on these two groups;
+*Richard Pinet: We constitute ourselves in relationship to these groups; this way we will be formally seated on these two groups;
--Cheryl Dickie: By requesting formal relationship with these groups, these groups will need to ensure and recognize us; if we can achieve formal affiliation; we can work on justification and providing rationale for our institutions;
+*Cheryl Dickie: By requesting formal relationship with these groups, these groups will need to ensure and recognize us; if we can achieve formal affiliation; we can work on justification and providing rationale for our institutions;