Distance Reading Wiki
From Brock University's Digital Humanities Compendium
Revision as of 13:55, 1 October 2011 (edit) Sm00ah (Talk | contribs) (→Posted Responses and Comments) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 13:55, 1 October 2011 (edit) (undo) Sm00ah (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
While the digital environment has given way to a range of new and useful means of textual analysis how does a statistical critique of literature and resources fit within traditional approaches? Do the possibilities for digital texts surpass or fall short of traditional approaches to printed materials? | While the digital environment has given way to a range of new and useful means of textual analysis how does a statistical critique of literature and resources fit within traditional approaches? Do the possibilities for digital texts surpass or fall short of traditional approaches to printed materials? | ||
+ | == Distance Reading Responses == | ||
** More questions to be posted in the coming days ** | ** More questions to be posted in the coming days ** | ||
Please post your answers and comments here.... | Please post your answers and comments here.... |
Revision as of 13:55, 1 October 2011
Distance Reading Articles
Cohen "Analyzing Literature by Words and Numbers"
Cohen "In 500 Billion Words..."
Crane "What Do You Do with a Million Books"
Moretti Graphs, Maps, Trees
Distance Reading Discussion Questions
Discussion Question 1:
To start out this week's debate we thought we'd begin with a couple of general questions. With the advent of the digital environment a much larger number of texts and resources have been made available. Practically speaking, is there a point at which there is simply too much available to be able to sort through - in other words, is there ever a point in which there is so much information, or the scale of it is so large, that it in fact impedes effective research?
Discussion Question 2:
While the digital environment has given way to a range of new and useful means of textual analysis how does a statistical critique of literature and resources fit within traditional approaches? Do the possibilities for digital texts surpass or fall short of traditional approaches to printed materials?
Distance Reading Responses
** More questions to be posted in the coming days **
Please post your answers and comments here....